CAN A LODGE BE ADJOURNED?
(An excerpt from Mackey’s Encyclopedia of Freemasonry)
Adjournment. C.W.Moore (Freemasons’ Mag., xii., p. 290) says: “We suppose it to be generally conceded that Lodges cannot properly be adjourned. It has been so decided by a large proportion of the Grand Lodges in America, and tacitly, at least, concurred in by all. We are not aware that there is a dissenting voice among them. It is, therefore, safe to assume that the settled policy is against adjournment.” The reason which he assigns for this rule is that adjournment is a method used only in deliberative bodies, such as legislatures and courts, and as Lodges do not partake of either of these, adjournments are not applicable to them. The rule which Bro. Moore lays down is undoubtedly correct, but the reason which he assigns for is not sufficient. If a Lodge were permitted to adjourn by a vote of the majority of its members, the control of the labor would be placed in their hands. But according to the whole spirit of the Masonic system, the Master alone controls and directs the hours of labor. In the 5th of the Old Charges, approved in 1722, it is declared that “All Masons shall meekly receive their Wages without murmuring or mutiny, and not desert the Master till the Lord’s work is finish’d.” Now as the Master alone can know when “the work is finished”, the selection of the time of closing must be vested in him. He is the sole judge of the proper period at which the labors of the Lodge should be terminated, and may suspend business even in the middle of a debate, if he supposes that it is expedient to close the Lodge. Hence no motion for adjournment can ever be admitted in a Masonic Lodge. Such a motion would be an interference with the prerogative of the Master, and could not therefore be entertained.
